Image 01

Jessica Kerman

digital journalist

Archive for December, 2009

New Year’s Resolution

Thursday, December 31st, 2009

This year, I would like to publish to this blog regularly, closer to once a day than once a month like it’s been in the past. There are a couple of reasons I feel like I should do this.

First, I need to get back into writing. After quitting my job at the newspaper, I have been laxed in continuing to create clips to put in my writing portfolio. This summer, when I worked in Ann Arbor, I proved that it’s not too difficult to get back into, but I still don’t have a ton of fresh clips to share.

Also, according to several outlets, journalists out of work should have a blog that is regularly updated. Doing this shows they are independent, self-starters who still enjoy certain aspects of the job. For me, I love the reporting— the interviewing and researching. I’m not sure this blog will bring that out, but I can at least practice the writing part.

I am worried though because I absolutely love journalism and news, but I’m not sure what to post about. So far I’ve been trying to stick to media news, but if I do I want to have something to add to the conversation, and to be honest, that’s not possible all the time. So, this might be a mix of all types of posts from things going on at Ball State to random tid bits about current events. I guess if this blog ever gets an audience, I’ll try to find a theme, but until then I’ll just do what pleases me.

So that’s my new year’s resolution— continue a blog and post to it regularly. I’m up for adding more to this. If anyone has any advice or something I should add, I’d love to hear it.

Audience values change the way local news is covered

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

Al Tompkins, of Al’s Morning Meeting on Poynter, posted a column this week about the changing values that audiences share and how that value shift is changing the way news is consumed, and thus reported.

The column features a Q and A session with Scripps Networks President John Lansing, who was quoted in the Wall Street Journal saying, “”It’s not so much [that we have] a different audience but an audience that’s acting different. Their value system is shifting from aspiring to material wealth to aspiring to a life better lived.”

This is an interesting way to think about the way people should invest in media.

Lansing says that people crave authenticity in their news, and that what they are getting is the Wal-Mart mass produced broadcast that anyone with B-roll and final cut could put together. This is key in understanding why people are not worried about the decline of local news— journalists have not proven themselves capable of doing a job better than any old hack off the street. The craft of journalism has been diminished to the equivalent of a 6th grader writing small reports for school every day. Authenticity means truly understanding the subject, talking to the REAL players (not just the talking heads) and digging deeper than anyone with an Internet connection could. It’s adding the context that differentiates journalists from any old blogger on the Web. It’s becoming an expert in a field and reporting on that field as an independent entity.

These old values are still the central part of journalism, and should be what companies strive to return to. Reinvesting in investigative journalism will mean a salvation for the craft.

Augmented reality presents possiblities in news

Thursday, December 24th, 2009

Traveling to another city could be a lot more interactive in the next few years. Picture yourself stepping out of the airport and point your phone’s video camera at something only to see any news story, dining menu, coupons, short documentaries or whatever you can think of. That seems to be the next step for news.

Jeff Jarvis posted some points on his blog BuzzMachine about these possibilities. Out of all the videos this one is my favorite:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b64_16K2e08]

This is an amazing opportunity for news organizations to reconnect with their customers and get some optimal advertising opportunities that can garner the amount of money they need to run an efficient business.

Every address, every building, every business has a story to tell. Visualize your world that way: Look at a restaurant and think about all the data that already swirls around it — its menu, its reviews and ratings and tags (descriptive words), its recipes, its ingredients, its suppliers (and how far away they are, if you care about that sort of thing), its reservation openings, who has been there (according to social applications), who do we know who has been there, its health-department reports, its credit-card data (in aggregate, of course), pictures of its interior, pictures of its food, its wine list, the history of the location, its decibel rating, its news…

And then think how we can annotate that with our own reviews, ratings, photos, videos, social-app check-ins and relationships, news, discussion, calendar entries, orders…. The same can be said of objects, brands — and people.

Jarvis suggests adding these qualities to people as well as to buildings and points of interest, but I’m not sure how I feel about that. First that would require us to have some kind of RFID tag on us at all times, allowing the government to track everything (even what they can’t right now). But also, I’m just not sure there is a good market for that. Yes, it’s great to know more about other people, but there is a sense of privacy that I know would like to have, and I think I’m part of majority in that respect. (Note I said “sense” because I am aware that privacy is realitve nowadays.)

Anyway, if news organizations (such as Gannett or News Corp) could pick this technology up and get it working before Google does it for free, it might be the direction needed for news to get back on track to a successful business model.